|
The 1801 Inclosure Act (1)
Lands and Tithes |
|
To contact us: |
|
Whilst the Napoleonic Wars were raging in Europe, in Chelveston another type of revolution was about to happen—Inclosure. This involved the division of the large open fields that had existed from medieval times into smaller plots of land.
There were several reasons behind the national policy, including the idea that the smaller fields would allow the farmers to carry out improvements to the land and that the spread of diseases would be reduced as their animals no longer intermixed.
The principle landowners were Col Edward Disbrowe (the Lord of the Manor) and the Rt Hon William Wentworth, Earl Fitzwilliam (lessee of the local Duchy of Lancaster estates) who held the land under a form of ownership that gave them the rights to the crops, but also meant that the villagers had “common rights” to partial use of the land, such as the right to graze their animals on the stubble once the harvest had been gathered in.
Other significant landowners included— Thomas Chettle, George and Green Gascoyen, Robert Eady, Sarah Chown, Timothy Hawker, John Knight, Thomas Chapman, the Church (Rev Pywell) and the Trustees of the Sawyers Charity.
The parish was inclosed under a private act The Inclosure Act 1801—an Act for the Dividing, Allotting and Inclosing the Open and Common Fields, Meadows, Commonable Lands, and Waste Grounds, in the Parish of Chelston otherwise Chelveston-cum-Caldecott, in the County of Northampton (c41 Geo. III).
Two commissioners were sworn in on 20th July 1801 to oversee the inclosure, Edward Hare (1741 –1816) of Castor, near Peterborough and Charles Bloodworth of Kimbolton, with Charles Marion Welstead of Kimbolton as umpire (the umpire’s role was to adjudicate if the commissioners did not agree with each other’s findings).
Edward Hare was a well known surveyor and Inclosure Commissioner, known to have done 23 Inclosures in Northamptonshire and 15 in Cambridgeshire.
It was the commissioners task to divide up the 1,700 acres into smaller fields and allocate them to the various landowners, based on the value of the land and in proportion to that which they owned before the inclosure. They also had to ensure that the villagers received some compensation for the loss of their common rights.
As an example, Robert Eady was awarded two fields— one in Water Yard next to his homestead of 16 perches (1 perch = 16.5 ft or just over 5m), valued at 2 shillings (10p) and the second of 3 acres, 2 roods (1 rood = 0.25 acre) and 23 perches valued at 4 pounds 11 shillings and 1 penny (£4.55) on the Raunds Rd (the field between Pretoria Cottages and the parish boundary).
Historically the Lord of the Manor held the Great Tithes and the Church held the Vicarial or Small Tithes— these were entitlements to a percentage of the crops or wool produced in the parish. The Tithe Barn (now demolished) can be seen beside Churchyard on the inclosure plan on the next page. As these rights would be commuted by the inclosure, the commissioners awarded them compensation land for their lost income.
The result is the 200 year old field system that can been seen around the parish today. |
